1002:2022:5.2
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
1002:2022:5.2 [2022/08/25 16:33] – [Why did early anthropologists ignore all these exceptions?] Ryan Schram (admin) | 1002:2022:5.2 [2022/08/30 15:50] (current) – [Late edition brain candy: Are your memories an out-of-body experience?] Ryan Schram (admin) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
**Other reading:** Carsten (1995) | **Other reading:** Carsten (1995) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===== A final note from Monday’s lecture ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== What’s the difference between kinship and descent? Are members of other unilineal descent groups still your kin? ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | This is an excellent question, because it’s really asking what we should call the topic of this module, Module II. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Family, ancestors, relatives, buʻuna, susu, etc., etc…. What are we talking about? | ||
+ | |||
+ | Historically, | ||
+ | |||
+ | * **Consanguineous** kin (relatives through parents). | ||
+ | * **Kinship** in general, i.e. the socially-recognized ties to other people through one’s parents. | ||
+ | * **Descent** specifically, | ||
+ | * **Affinal** kin (relatives through marriage, or what English speakers call in-laws, e.g. father-in-law). | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Kinship’s weak link is the proliferation of technical terms ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Just because we have specialized, | ||
+ | |||
+ | We’ve just [[: | ||
Line 39: | Line 61: | ||
===== A lingering bias ===== | ===== A lingering bias ===== | ||
- | Kinship is purely social system of categories, and need not have any connection to biology and reproduction. So what’s with all this talk of marriage, parents, children? | + | Kinship is a purely social system of categories, and need not have any connection to biology and reproduction. So what’s with all this talk of marriage, parents, children? |
* Do people have to form heterosexual, | * Do people have to form heterosexual, | ||
Line 59: | Line 81: | ||
- by studying people’s genealogical connections and the categories that they used to divide them up, they thought they could examine a society objectively and arrive at scientific explanations for many common forms of kinship, like the cross–parallel distinction and the prohibition on incest. | - by studying people’s genealogical connections and the categories that they used to divide them up, they thought they could examine a society objectively and arrive at scientific explanations for many common forms of kinship, like the cross–parallel distinction and the prohibition on incest. | ||
- | Making kinship diagrams is very much in this spirit. | + | Making kinship diagrams is very much in this scientific |
* By boiling down masses of information to lines and shapes, we can reveal a lot that is obscure, **but** | * By boiling down masses of information to lines and shapes, we can reveal a lot that is obscure, **but** | ||
Line 87: | Line 109: | ||
* Furthermore, | * Furthermore, | ||
* Kinship is not just an act, it is an act of “nourishment, | * Kinship is not just an act, it is an act of “nourishment, | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Late edition brain candy: Are your memories an out-of-body experience? ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | When we remember, we can see ourselves as others see us. Do we see what they also ascribe to us? Or, do we see only what we think we are? | ||
+ | |||
+ | Stern, Jacob. 2022. “You’ve Probably Seen Yourself in Your Memories.” //The Atlantic//, August 29, 2022. https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
===== References and further reading ===== | ===== References and further reading ===== |
1002/2022/5.2.1661470394.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/08/25 16:33 by Ryan Schram (admin)