Site frozen. Go to Anthrograph for the latest [July 4, 2025]

I am pleased to announce that I am debuting a new site for teaching resources at https://anthrograph.rschram.org. Please visit and browse.

The Anthrocyclopaedia will remain for now as an archive but will no longer be updated. I will be manually moving materials from this site to Anthrograph from today, editing and updating as I go. Thanks for your visits over the many years---over 10!---that this site has been active. I look forward to welcoming you to a new teaching site.

Ryan Schram's Anthrocyclopaedia

Anthropology presentations and learning resources

User Tools

Site Tools

You are here: start » 1002 » 2020 » types-of-pubs
1002:2020:types-of-pubs

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

1002:2020:types-of-pubs [2020/08/18 19:40] – external edit 127.0.0.11002:2020:types-of-pubs [2020/08/18 19:56] (current) – Ryan Schram (admin)
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Types of scholarly writing ====== ====== Types of scholarly writing ======
- 
-<HTML> 
-<figure> 
-</HTML> 
-<html><img src="" alt=""/></html> 
-<HTML> 
-<figcaption style="font-size: 0.8em;color:#779"> 
-</HTML> 
-An illustration of a cockatoo in a manuscript based on Islamic sources, indicating the contact between the Islamic world and Australasia in the 13th century C.E. (Frederick II 1258, 18v; see also Dalton et al. 2018). 
-<HTML> 
-</figcaption> 
-</figure> 
-</HTML> 
  
 As you know, every week you have something to read. We usually call this a “reading,” and that’s fine. But it is also somebody’s “writing.” Scholars usually present their ideas and the results of their research by writing about it. Often their writing is not intended for students (although the truly great scholars are able to explain their ideas in words that anyone can understand, and we do try to find this kind of work for class). But if they weren’t writing for students, what were they trying to do? As you know, every week you have something to read. We usually call this a “reading,” and that’s fine. But it is also somebody’s “writing.” Scholars usually present their ideas and the results of their research by writing about it. Often their writing is not intended for students (although the truly great scholars are able to explain their ideas in words that anyone can understand, and we do try to find this kind of work for class). But if they weren’t writing for students, what were they trying to do?
Line 26: Line 13:
  
 Cliggett, Lisa. 2003. “Gift Remitting and Alliance Building in Zambian Modernity: Old Answers to Modern Problems.” //American Anthropologist// 105 (3): 543–52. doi:[[https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2003.105.3.543|10.1525/aa.2003.105.3.543]]. Cliggett, Lisa. 2003. “Gift Remitting and Alliance Building in Zambian Modernity: Old Answers to Modern Problems.” //American Anthropologist// 105 (3): 543–52. doi:[[https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2003.105.3.543|10.1525/aa.2003.105.3.543]].
- 
- 
-Dalton, Heather, Jukka Salo, Pekka Niemelä, and Simo Örmä. 2018. “Frederick II of Hohenstaufen’s Australasian Cockatoo: Symbol of Detente Between East and West and Evidence of the Ayyubids’ Global Reach.” //Parergon// 35 (1): 35–60. doi:[[https://doi.org/10.1353/pgn.2018.0002|10.1353/pgn.2018.0002]]. 
- 
- 
-Frederick II. 1258. “De Arte Venandi Cum Avibus.” https://digi.vatlib.it/view/MSS_Pal.lat.1071. 
  
  
1002/2020/types-of-pubs.1597804850.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/08/18 19:40 by 127.0.0.1