1002:13.2
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| 1002:13.2 [2015/07/02 17:38] – [ANTH 1002 is in Bosch LT 1] Ryan Schram (admin) | 1002:13.2 [Unknown date] (current) – removed - external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ~~DECKJS~~ | ||
| - | # Around the world in 13 weeks # | ||
| - | |||
| - | ## Around the world in 13 weeks ## | ||
| - | |||
| - | Ryan Schram | ||
| - | |||
| - | 29 October 2014 | ||
| - | |||
| - | ryan.schram@sydney.edu.au | ||
| - | |||
| - | Mills 169 (A26) | ||
| - | |||
| - | Available at http:// | ||
| - | |||
| - | With help from Terry Woronov, Emma Young and the ANTH 1002 tutors. | ||
| - | |||
| - | ## How anthropologists look at globalization ## | ||
| - | |||
| - | As Terry Woronov said in her 2013 review of this class, " | ||
| - | does not wipe out difference--it **produces** new dynamics that | ||
| - | sustain difference, and **enables the ongoing reproduction of | ||
| - | difference**." | ||
| - | |||
| - | ## Snake and mongoose ## | ||
| - | |||
| - | Contemporary life is a lot like the snake and the mongoose: Fast | ||
| - | friends, arch rivals! Available for streaming now! | ||
| - | |||
| - | {{: | ||
| - | |||
| - | ## Snake and mongoose ## | ||
| - | |||
| - | That is, contemporary life is defined by its contradictions. There are | ||
| - | copresent forces in tension, leading to confict and also unexpected | ||
| - | side-effects. | ||
| - | |||
| - | * Globalization involves change in societies. | ||
| - | * Globalization allows people to recreate a coherent cultural order | ||
| - | with new materials. | ||
| - | |||
| - | ## Gift and commodity ## | ||
| - | |||
| - | The first part of the class was devoted to the contradiction between | ||
| - | gift and commodity. | ||
| - | |||
| - | * What is the difference between a gift and a commodity? | ||
| - | * What is an example of each of these? | ||
| - | * What is an example where gift and commodity come together in one place? | ||
| - | - An example we read or saw in class. | ||
| - | - An example from your own knowledge and experience. | ||
| - | |||
| - | ## Marcel Mauss ## | ||
| - | |||
| - | Key ideas: | ||
| - | |||
| - | * Exchange entails obligations to one's exchange partner and to | ||
| - | society as a whole. | ||
| - | - The obligation to give | ||
| - | - The obligation to receive | ||
| - | - The obligation to reciprocate. | ||
| - | * Gifts have a spirit, the *hau*. A gift wishes to return to its | ||
| - | birthplace. | ||
| - | |||
| - | ## Karl Marx ## | ||
| - | |||
| - | Key ideas: | ||
| - | |||
| - | * Capitalism is a social system based on exchanging commodities. | ||
| - | * Commodities are things that you can own as private property. | ||
| - | * Ironic twist! Commodities are created by alienating them from the | ||
| - | people who make them. Wage labor deprives people of the true value | ||
| - | of their labor and allows owners of wealth to reap a profit from | ||
| - | exchange. | ||
| - | * The formula of capital is M - C - M'. | ||
| - | |||
| - | ## Marcel Mauss and Karl Marx, separated at birth?? ## | ||
| - | |||
| - | Although Marx and Mauss did not directly address each other' | ||
| - | they seem to have an affinity. This has been very important in the | ||
| - | study of globalization. Anthropologists generally see globalization as | ||
| - | an interaction between gift systems and capitalism. | ||
| - | |||
| - | ## Spheres of exchange ## | ||
| - | |||
| - | * Paul Bohannon presents Tiv culture as an example in which all exchanges are regulated by spheres of exchange. | ||
| - | - Subsistence items, foodstuffs, tools. | ||
| - | - Prestige items, i.e. brass rods and fine tugudu cloth. | ||
| - | - Women as wives. | ||
| - | |||
| - | * Cash did not collapse the spheres; it just got put in the lowest sphere. (At least at first.) | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | ## When worlds collide ## | ||
| - | |||
| - | * Tension and conflict | ||
| - | * Efflorescence | ||
| - | * Transformation | ||
| - | |||
| - | What are some examples of each of these? | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | ## Oil on canvas ## | ||
| - | |||
| - | {{: | ||
| - | |||
| - | Why is this painting worth 140 million US dollars (in 2006)? | ||
| - | |||
| - | ## The problem of commodification ## | ||
| - | |||
| - | * Can everything be a commodity? | ||
| - | - Human organs? | ||
| - | - Priceless art treasures (*No. 5, 1948* by Jackson Pollock, sold for $140 M in 2006)? | ||
| - | - Marriage? | ||
| - | * You can't have growth in indigenous art forms without a commodity | ||
| - | market to support it! | ||
| - | * Cannibal Tours: Tourists want a unspoiled indigenous culture, but | ||
| - | Sepik River villagers want money to send their children to | ||
| - | school. Which is the ‘true’ Sepik River culture? | ||
| - | |||
| - | ## The family as site of analysis ## | ||
| - | |||
| - | People tend to assume that family is distinct from other kinds of | ||
| - | relationship, | ||
| - | economic actor. | ||
| - | |||
| - | Families are sites of snakes and mongooses. They are **both** moral | ||
| - | **and** economic. | ||
| - | |||
| - | * What are the readings in which a family is a site for revealing the | ||
| - | copresence of moral and economic domains? | ||
| - | * In what ways are families units of global economic systems? How do | ||
| - | families regulate circulation, | ||
| - | |||
| - | ## Becoming an individual, becoming a factory worker ## | ||
| - | |||
| - | In many societies, people are faced with alternative ways of being and | ||
| - | ways of presenting oneself to others. | ||
| - | |||
| - | * What readings are examples of alternative personhoods? | ||
| - | these alternative personhoods come from? | ||
| - | |||
| - | The concept of a culturally-constructed person is relevant to | ||
| - | understanding the global economic order. | ||
| - | |||
| - | * What kinds of persons facilitate global capitalism as we see it? | ||
| - | |||
| - | ## Multiple modernities ## | ||
| - | |||
| - | * Not all change is progress. | ||
| - | * There are multiple paths of change that societies can follow. | ||
| - | * Not all societies want to imitate European history. | ||
| - | * Not all social change can be described as individual liberation. | ||
| - | * ' | ||
| - | |||
| - | ## Parallel modernities ## | ||
| - | |||
| - | * Bollywood in Nigeria: | ||
| - | - Hindi stories allow Hausa men to imagine reimagine what change means. | ||
| - | * Globalization is changing relationship between: | ||
| - | - Media technology | ||
| - | - Patterns of circulation | ||
| - | - Patterns of consumption | ||
| - | - Politics of identity | ||
| - | * There are global routes of circulation which parallel the movement | ||
| - | of Western forms to other societies. | ||
| - | |||
| - | ## Parallel modernities ## | ||
| - | |||
| - | * There are many ways to move things around the world; there is no | ||
| - | single system of circulation (ie, Hollywood' | ||
| - | licensing isn't the only way to get movies shown around the world.) | ||
| - | - Nigerian Bollywood: informal systems of itinerant (Lebanese) | ||
| - | traders, enmeshed in systems that bypass the formal banking system | ||
| - | - Global body shopping: a system for circulating one kind of | ||
| - | person (IT trained) around the world, driven by diasporic personal | ||
| - | relations, parallel to formal recruitment systems) | ||
| - | - Black markets (e.g., organs, drugs, ' | ||
| - | |||
| - | ## Alternate modernities ## | ||
| - | |||
| - | Alternate modernity is the thesis that the same kinds of social forces | ||
| - | which have transformed European societies have an analogue outside of | ||
| - | the West. | ||
| - | |||
| - | Max Weber says Protestant Christianity in Europe taught people to **see | ||
| - | themselves as individuals**, | ||
| - | moral thinking. | ||
| - | |||
| - | Brenner says that expressions of Islamic modesty, especially the veil, | ||
| - | allow women to **define their identity in opposition to the village and | ||
| - | its obligations**. Being a visibly pious Muslim is a way of asserting | ||
| - | autonomy from traditional codes. | ||
| - | |||
| - | ## Alternate modernities ## | ||
| - | |||
| - | * Max Weber predicts that as time goes by, all societies become less | ||
| - | religious and more secular. | ||
| - | * Veiling explicitly contests secular modernity: | ||
| - | - Western modernity is based on secularism, freedom of religion, and | ||
| - | personal choice. | ||
| - | - The Islamic movement is based on individual faith, self-discipline | ||
| - | and a break with traditional *adat*. | ||
| - | * Veiling in Java is explicitly neither a " | ||
| - | " | ||
| - | be part of the modern world, other than those dictated by the West. | ||
| - | |||
| - | ## References ## | ||
| - | |||
| - | Blain, Andrea. 2014. "' | ||
| - | Spring." | ||
| - | |||
| - | Pollock, Jackson. 1948. No. 5, 1948. Oil on canvas. http:// | ||
| - | |||
1002/13.2.1435883925.txt.gz · Last modified: 2015/07/02 17:38 by Ryan Schram (admin)